Connect with us


Democratic Civil War Heats Up as Tulsi Gabbard Sues Hillary Clinton

Clinton, who isn’t even running for office, has been sticking her nose where it doesn’t belong – and Tulsi’s not having it!

At the rate they’re going, the Democrats won’t have anyone left to run for President by the time the general election rolls around.

The left is embroiled in a bitter fight at the moment, with the radical youth of the party attempting to pry power from the Deep State Dems.  It’s Bernie’s socialism versus Biden’s centrism, and it’s being played out on the national stage in bizarre ways.

For instance, former Secretary of State and failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton has again inserted herself into the 2020 conversation, despite not choosing to actually run for office, by trashing candidates deemed dangerous to the Biden stranglehold on polling.  In one such outburst, she described Hawaii Rep. Tulsi Gabbard as a “Russian asset”, claiming that the combat veteran was being “groomed” by the Kremlin to be a spoiler in the 2020 race.

Trending: DOJ Sends ObamaGate Investigator John Durham After Clinton Foundation

For that, Clinton is getting slapped with a rather substantial lawsuit.

take our poll - story continues below

Will You Be Voting In Person November 3rd?

  • Will You Be Voting In Person November 3rd?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Liberty Hub updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Democratic presidential candidate Rep. Tulsi Gabbard of Hawaii is accusing former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton of deliberately spreading false accusations that Gabbard is a Russian asset in a lawsuit seeking upwards of $50 million in damages.

During an October 2019 interview with the podcast Campaign HQ With David Plouffe, Clinton suggested the 2020 presidential candidate was “the favorite of the Russians” and “a Russian asset.” Gabbard insists these statements have no grounds in reality, and that Clinton knew or should have known this at the time.

“Rather than facts or reliable evidence, Clinton’s basis for the Defamatory Statements was one or both of: (a) her own imagination; or (b) extremely dubious conspiracy theories that any reasonable person (and especially Clinton, a former United States Senator and Secretary of State) would know to be fanciful, wholly unverified, and inherently and objectively unreliable,” said the lawsuit, filed Wednesday in Manhattan federal court.

It is doubtful that Gabbard will succeed in squeezing a single penny out of Clinton over the comment, but the lawsuit still serves as an inspiration to those who have long felt intimidated Clinton and the Democratic Deep State that she represents.


Save conservative media!

Become an insider!

Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

You Might Like

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it, please mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

You Might Like

VIDEO: Seattle Cop Runs Over Protester’s Head in Viral Clip


How Do I Know If I’m an Alcoholic?

The Freedom Model

FBI Official Claims Michael Flynn Investigation Was Designed to ‘Get Trump’


Senate Unanimously Rebukes President, Passes Resolution on ‘Peaceful Transfer’ of Power