×

We chose a different approach. Will you support it? Unlike liberal news organizations, we made a choice to keep all of our independent, investigative reporting open for everyone. We believe each American deserves access to accurate information with integrity at its heart. At a time when fake news and Leftwing censorship threatens free speech, support from our readers is paramount in safeguarding our editorial independence. This is our model for open, real, truthful journalism. If you're able to, please support us today from as little as $1.

Connect with us

Politics

Devin Nunes Lays Down the Law, Plans to Call Adam Schiff to Witness Stand

Looks like Little Adam Schiff has some explaining to do.

The secretive and lopsided “formal impeachment inquiry” being conducted by the Democrats is now entering its more public phase, and that has some of the GOP licking their chops.

Finally, they will have a chance to refute the ridiculous rhetoric being selectively leaked to the media throughout the clandestine process, and defend the President who was elected by We The People.

Furthermore, there are righteous concerns about just who and why the impeachment process began in the first place, with many wondering just what sort of contact House Democrats had with the purported UkraineGate “whistleblower” prior to laughing their probe.

Trending: Pelosi Attempts to Slam Trump with More ‘Impeached Forever’ Talk

That why Devin Nunes is on the hunt.

take our poll - story continues below

Will You Vote For Donald Trump in 2020?

  • Will You Vote For Donald Trump in 2020?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Liberty Hub updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

House Intelligence Committee Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA) on Friday sent a letter to Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) requesting that the House Intelligence Committee chairman testify as part of the impeachment inquiry.

In the letter, Nunes argued that Schiff should testify in lieu of the “whistleblower,” since the “whistleblower” went to Schiff’s staff before filing his complaint and since Schiff will not let the whistleblower testify.

In his letter to Schiff, Nunes wrote:

As the American public is now aware, in August 2019, you and/or your staff met with or talked to the whistleblower who raised an issue with President Trump’s phone call with Ukrainian President Zelensky. Although you claim that nothing inappropriate was discussed, the three committees deserve to hear directly from you the substance and circumstances surrounding any discussions conducted with the whistleblower, and any instructions you issued regarding those discussions. Given that you have reneged on your public commitment to let the committees interview the whistleblower directly, you are the only individual who can provide clarity as to these conversations.

There are procedural concerns to be addressed as well, given that the Democrats have conducted most of their hearings so far in a secure and secretive location, away from the deserving gaze of the American public…something that Adam Schiff himself will need to atone for.

Save conservative media!

Become an insider!

Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

You Might Like

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

You Might Like

Bernie Misses Out on NYT Endorsement as Paper Disses Dem’s Health and Age

Politics

Liz Warren Liz Warren

Oh, The Irony: Liz Warren Laments Voters Who Support Candidates Who “Lie to Them”

Politics

Peace Prevails as Second Amendment Supporters Demand Change in Old Dominion

Politics

White House White House

White House Issues Stern Statement Regarding ‘Frivolous’ Impeachment on Eve of Trial

Politics