Connect with us

Opinion

DOJ Probing ‘Bribery-for-Pardon’ Scheme Involving the White House

Not a good look for the West Wing here…

As far as political firsts go, America has seen quite a few over the course of the last several years.

Some of this is thanks to President Trump, who was elected, at least in part, in an effort to shake up the Washington elite’s status quo.  Trump coasted to the 2016 finish line with his supporters chanting “lock her up” and “drain the swamp”; it’s doesn’t get any more “rock the boat” than that.

As Trump’s first term rolled on, we saw ever more of this unique politicking, as our nation’s governmental norms were tested and torqued.

Trending: James Comey Suggest ‘Burning the GOP to the Ground’

Now, however, as Trump prepares to leave office, the DOJ is taking a look at something way out of the ordinary at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.

Federal investigators are looking into a potential “bribery-for-pardon” scheme involving presidential pardons, according to federal court documents unsealed by the chief judge for the federal court in Washington.

The heavily redacted documents revealed Tuesday do not name the individuals involved or President Donald Trump. They also do not indicate if any White House officials had knowledge of the scheme.

“No government official was or is currently a subject or target of the investigation disclosed in this filing,” a Justice Department official said.

The documents discuss whether prosecutors can review documents that may have been protected by attorney-client privilege and were seized as a result of a search warrant.

take our poll - story continues below

Has Big Tech Gone Too Far Banning the President?

  • Has Big Tech Gone Too Far Banning the President?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Liberty Hub updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

There is no doubt that the White House was involved, either.

The opinion, entered by Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell on Aug. 28, is tied to an ongoing investigation that may involve at least two individuals who “acted as lobbyists to senior White House officials, without complying with the registration requirement of the Lobbying Disclosure Act … to secure ‘a pardon or reprieve of sentence for'” one individual whose name is redacted.

While there has been no official announcement of who might be involved, social media users appeared convinced that Rudy Giuliani was somehow involved.

Save conservative media!

Become an insider!

Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

You Might Like

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it, please mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

You Might Like

Schaftlein Report | Biden speaks as a Centrist – Executive Orders as a Leftist

Opinion

James Comey Suggest ‘Burning the GOP to the Ground’

Opinion

michael moore michael moore

Michael Moore Goes on Unhinged Rant as Donald Trump Leaves Office

*Headline

House Democrat Calls for FBI to Take a Peek at Parler

News