Opinion
Dr. Fauci’s Fingerprints Found on Report Denouncing Lab-Leak Theory
Rand Paul was ready with a HEAVY rebuke.
For years now, conservatives have been suggesting that Dr. Anthony Fauci could not be trusted. His work as the nation’s top epidemiologist during the early days of the coronavirus pandemic have been mired in controversy, particularly as it pertains to his work in suppressing anything but the “official story” of the outbreak.
Now, as it turns out, Fauci may have been involved in propagating theories that pushed back on a rather credible theory that proposed the pandemic was caused by a laboratory leak – which is an idea that has gained a great deal of credence over the course of the last several weeks.
Dr. Anthony Fauci, former National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and White House medical advisor, reportedly commissioned and approved of a paper steering the narrative on the origins of the coronavirus — ultimately attempting to discredit the lab leak theory — prompting outrage from Republicans, calling to hold him accountable.
A March 5 memo sent to members of the Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic reveals that Fauci, along with “at least eleven other scientists” participated in a conference call on February 1, 2020, where they were told that the coronavirus, which originated in Wuhan, China, may have leaked from a lab.
Conveniently, three days later, “four participants of the conference call authored a paper entitled ‘The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2’ (Proximal Origin) and sent a draft to Drs. Fauci and Collins,” per the memo.
“Prior to final publication in Nature Medicine, the paper was sent to Dr. Fauci for editing and approval,” the memo notes, explaining that Fauci used the paper two months later in an attempt to publicly dismiss the lab leak theory.
The news had many longtime Fauci critics furious.
“Follow the $—the $ for the Wuhan Lab he approved. This line of questioning was pursued in our depo of Fauci as well. He didn’t want to be implicated in the Lab Leak so he dismissed it & smeared anyone who thought it plausible,” Sen. Eric. Schmitt (R-MO) said.
“He must be held accountable,” he added:
“This reminds me of how Hillary Clinton cooked up the Russia Hoax, planted it in the media, and then cited media reports to provide ‘independent’ evidence for the fabricated theory,” author and filmmaker Dinesh D’Souza remarked:
“We now know Fauci orchestrated a fraudulent paper he then used to dismiss #LabLeak. A 3/20 blog by his boss/co-conspirator Francis Collins: ‘this study leaves little room to refute a natural origin for COVID’ Lab origin is ‘outrageous claim’ & ‘rumor,’” the White Coat Waste Project’s Justin Goodman said:
Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY), who has long questioned Fauci and his honesty, retweeted a clip of MSNBC’s Nicolle Wallace referring the lab leak theory as a Trump conspiracy theory:
“After funding gain-of-function research at the Wuhan lab, Fauci smeared those of us who suggested the possibility of a lab leak. He must be held accountable,” Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR) said as others expressed disgust over the latest reports.
Should the lab leak theory every be proven in earnest, the global community’s response would undoubtedly put China in a difficult place, and it could reignite tensions between Beijing and the rest of the world.
Become an insider!
Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

Trending Now on Liberty Hub
Heckler Has Witty Question for Nancy Pelosi – Her Response is WILD
Biden Buddy FLIPS! Will Testify to House Panel Investigating…
Oregon Grants Homeless the Right to Sue for ‘Harassment’
Amid Coronavirus Crisis, Trump Approval Polling Pops to All Time High
Breitbart Accuses Google of Election Interference After Search Results Tampered With
US Looks to Fly Migrant Surge to Canadian Border for Processing
United Nations Chief has DIRE Warning About World War III
Join the conversation!
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it, please mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.