Connect with us

News

Facebook Plans to Throttle Users if Election Gets Heated

Facebook isn’t even trying to hide their Big-Brother tactics anymore.

As 2020 continues to spiral into some Orwellian nightmare, one of the world’s premier social media networks is threatening to silence American voices should the coming elections’ results cause unrest.

Facebook has long held a controversial place in American politics, beginning during the election cycle of 2016 when the platform appeared to be openly discriminating against conservative news aggregators and political personalities.  Now, 4 years later, the social media magnates are catching flak for their hands-off approach to fact-checking political advertisements on the platform.

It seems as though they are doomed to fail no matter what they do.

Trending: Trump Storms Out of 60 Minutes Interview, Threatens to Release Footage Ahead of Schedule

Now, with a tumultuous election just over the horizon, Facebook is threatening to restrict users’ access to the platform should the results of that contest cause any sort of unrest.

take our poll - story continues below

Will You Be Voting In Person November 3rd?(2)

  • Will You Be Voting In Person November 3rd?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Liberty Hub updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

According to a report by the Financial Times, Facebook announced this week that it will “restrict the circulation of content” following November’s election to curb violence and social unrest. The announcement follows efforts by Facebook to address concerns from those who have alleged that the platform aids in voter suppression and promotes election-misinformation.

Facebook Head of Global Affairs Nick Clegg said that the company is prepared to adopt a set of policies that are designed to decrease the likelihood of social unrest following November’s election.

“There are some break-glass options available to us if there really is an extremely chaotic and, worse still, violent set of circumstances,” Clegg said.

Clegg claims that Facebook has used similar protocols in other areas of the world to limit “We have acted aggressively in other parts of the world where we think that there is real civic instability and we obviously have the tools to do that [again],” Clegg said.

This begs the question, of course, as to whether or not Facebook has grown omnipresent, thus making the platform a space protected by the First Amendment, despite the company’s insistence that they are a private corporation allowed to restrict speech however they see fit.

 

Save conservative media!

Become an insider!

Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

You Might Like

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it, please mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

You Might Like

Mandated by the Legal System to Attend AA or NA? Here are 3 Things You Need to Know

The Freedom Model

Bill Barr Bill Barr

Trump Commands Bill Barr to Investigate Hunter Biden Laptop Scandal

Opinion

Bloomberg’s Florida Spending Spree Has Trump Campaign Seeing Red

Opinion

Pennsylvania Troubles Loom for President Trump in Latest Poll

Politics