Connect with us

Opinion

House of Representatives Gets to Work on $2K Direct Payments After Relief Bill Signed

The people want it. The President wants it. Even the Democrats want it. How much face does the Senate GOP want to save?

The confusion on Capitol Hill has been astounding this week, and the timing could not have been worse.

For months on end, the American people have been waiting for a COVID-19 relief bill that hasn’t come.  The stalemate was split directly down party lines for much of this waiting, up until President Donald Trump began demanding that the direct payments to Americans be increased to $2,000.  This was not amenable to Congressional Republicans, but was favored by the Democrats.

Trump would eventually sign an earlier draft of the bill that provided only $600 in stimulus payments, but Congress is now moving to take another stab at the big bucks.

The House will vote Monday on increasing the second round of federal direct payments to $2,000 as Democrats embrace President Donald Trump’s calls to put more money in Americans’ pockets.

The measure would boost the stimulus checks in the year-end coronavirus relief and government funding package to $2,000 from $600. The vote comes a day after Trump signed the more than $2 trillion pandemic aid and full-year government spending bill into law.

Last week, the president called the legislation a “disgrace.” He waited days to sign the package after he received it from Congress. Trump claimed he opposed the bill — which his Treasury secretary helped to negotiate and which included many of his White House’s budget priorities — because it included too little direct money to Americans and too much foreign aid.

Trump has pushed for $2,000 payments in recent days. In a statement explaining his decision to sign the legislation Sunday, he noted that the House and potentially the Senate could move to approve larger cash deposits. However, most Republicans in the GOP-held Senate have opposed even a $1,200 check.

The move could leave the Senate GOP with egg on their face, as they’d be the only group who opposes the additional stimulus.

 

Become an insider!

Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

You Might Like

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it, please mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

You Might Like

China Invading USA, Buying Tracts of Land Adjacent to Sensitive Sites

Opinion

Judge Rules Gun Ban for Marijuana Users is Unconstitutional

Opinion

United Nations Chief has DIRE Warning About World War III

Opinion

BOMBSHELL: Rep. Speculates that DOD Kept Trump in the Dark on China Spying

Opinion