Connect with us


Kentucky AG Now Looking to Delay Release of Grand Jury Material in Breonna Taylor Case

This will almost certainly irk activists who have been demanding answers for months.

It was only days ago that a grand jury determined that only one officer would be charged with a crime during the raid that killed Breonna Taylor back in March, and that those charges would not be directly related to Taylor’s death at all.  Instead, the officer in question was charged with “wanton endangerment” after discharging his weapon recklessly and into the apartment next door to Taylor’s.

This sent protesters back out into the streets to again demand justice for the young woman, who was shot several times by police during the late night raid.

This week, a member of that grand jury lamented that the process was not as transparent as it should have been, legally requesting the right to speak about their experience.

Trending: Former Intel Officials Contradict DNI Over Hunter Biden Laptop Story

The Kentucky Governor also called for the grand jury materials to be made public, something that the state’s Attorney General seemed amenable to.  Now, that appears to have changed.

take our poll - story continues below

Will You Be Voting In Person November 3rd?(2)

  • Will You Be Voting In Person November 3rd?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Liberty Hub updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Kentucky Attorney General Daniel Cameron’s office on Wednesday announced it moved to delay the release of grand jury records in the controversial March police shooting of Breonna Taylor in Louisville, hours before the audio recording of the proceedings was set to go public.

Cameron’s office filed a motion late Tuesday to delay the release by one week in order to protect the identity of the witnesses, particularly the private citizens, named in the recording, the Louisville Courier-Journal reported. His office said it wants to “redact personal identifiers of any named person and to redact both names and personal identifiers of any private citizen.”

While those redactions appear to be for the greater good, the delay is almost certain to fuel the fire of protesters who have long believed that something fishy is occurring with Taylor’s case.

Save conservative media!

Become an insider!

Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

You Might Like

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it, please mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

You Might Like

Former Intel Officials Contradict DNI Over Hunter Biden Laptop Story


Election Worker Fired for Turning Away Voters Wearing BLM Apparel


Debate Commission Set to Mute Mics During Thursday’s Final Contest


supreme court SCOTUS supreme court SCOTUS

Supreme Court Moves to Extend Ballot Deadline in Pennsylvania