Connect with us

News

Mueller’s Most Mysterious Grand Jury Maneuvers will Remain Secret for Now

Transparency has been the battle cry of patriotic Americans everywhere in the wake of the Mueller report’s finalization, and this ruling may not sit well with an already impatient congress either.

In the long and controversial history of Robert Mueller’s Russiagate investigation, one particular case has remained the subject of a great mystery despite all efforts toward transparency.

This is the same case that had an entire floor of a DC courtroom quarantined from the public back in December.

An entire floor of the courthouse was closed to the public and press for more than an hour. During that time, attorneys secretly entered the courthouse to argue before three federal appellate judges over a grand jury subpoena.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, the E. Barrett Prettyman building – United States Courthouse, April 26, 2013, in Washington D.C.
The mystery of the subpoena appeal appears to date back to early September, when CNN witnessed several lawyers from Mueller’s office entering a courtroom to argue against an unknown defense team before a trial-level judge who oversees federal grand jury-related cases.
Clearly, a challenge related to Mueller’s grand jury investigation was underway.

What is known about the case is simply that a large, Russian company is at the crux of the legal battle – something that is worrisome for Americans concerned about the Kremlin’s reported interference in the 2016 US presidential election.

Trending: Colorado Takes a Shot at Big Pharma with Aggressive New Legislation

The identity of this company will remain a secret, however, after a recent ruling by a federal judge.

take our poll - story continues below

Who is most likely to win the Democrat nomination?

  • Who is most likely to win the Democrat nomination?

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Liberty Hub updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

A federal judge in Washington, D.C., ruled she would not be revealing the identity of the mystery company at the center of a grand jury battle left over from special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation. But the judge did rule that briefs and transcripts in the case that are sealed would be reviewed for possible redaction and release.

The motion to reveal the identity of the unknown “Corporation” from “Country A” — and to unseal these case documents — was brought by the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press in February 2019. Chief Judge Beryl Howell of the U.S. District Court for D.C. ruled that the motion “is granted in part and denied in part.”

Transparency has been the battle cry of patriotic Americans everywhere in the wake of the Mueller report’s finalization, and this ruling may not sit well with an already impatient congress either.

 

 

Become an insider!

Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

You Might Like

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

You Might Like

Colorado Takes a Shot at Big Pharma with Aggressive New Legislation

News

Tom Coleman Adds New ‘I’ Word to ‘Resistance’ Rhetoric: ILLEGITIMATE

News

Republican Lawmaker Gets on Board with Public Mueller Testimony

News

Jim Acosta Attempts to Subterfuge Trump’s Rage in New Book

Entertainment