Connect with us

News

New York Times Says President Trump Suggested Shooting Migrants In the Legs [Details]

Okay, if this is true it’s pretty bad.

But it’s coming from the New York Times, so…

I forget — does the Times have an agenda against Trump and every single person who has or who will ever work in his administration?

From The Hill:

The Times report is based on interviews with more than a dozen White House administration officials involved in the events the week of the meeting. The article is adapted from a forthcoming book by reporters Michael Shear and Julie Hirschfeld Davis titled “Border Wars: Inside Trump’s Assault on Immigration.” It will be published Oct. 8.

The aides told the Times that Trump suggested to advisers during the Oval Office meeting that they should shoot migrants in the legs to slow them down.

That suggestion came after Trump had publicly suggested shooting migrants if they threw rocks during a speech in November, the Times reported.

Donald Trump Jr. seems to have taken after his father in his fearlessness when it comes to calling out evil folks for their wicked statements, particularly hateful ones against Jews like those tossed out on Twitter by New York Times editor Jazmine Hughes.

Like father, like son. Makes you wonder if he’ll run for the White House one day, doesn’t it?

He could probably pull off a pretty solid victory, especially if he holds to the policies of his father.

Here’s the scoop from The Daily Wire:

I started to make a list of all the racist, anti-Semitic @NYTimes employees who’ve made cookie-cutter ‘apologies’ and kept their jobs … But I quickly realized there just aren’t enough hours left in the day.

The tweets come less than a week after other bigoted tweets from NY Times fact-checker Gina Cherelus were discovered. Trump Jr. also took her to the woodshed over her comments:

What is truly maddening about all of this is the clear double standard being employed by the modern day left. If a conservative had said something like this, the cries for said individual to be fired would be loud and ceaseless.

In fact, the individual’s whole career would’ve been destroyed in just a matter of days.

But when a fellow liberal does something heinous like this — which is actually quite often — it seems there are no negative consequences for them because they are protected by their own, simply for believing in progressive doctrine.

It’s shameful and corrupt, but when has that ever stopped a liberal from doing their part to push forward the progressive agenda?

Become an insider!

Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it, please mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

INNER TURMOIL: Biden Advisers Reportedly Unsure of President’s Ability to Campaign

Opinion

COMMON SENSE: Bipartisan Bill Looks to Keep A.I. from Running Nuke Security

Opinion

Oregon Grants Homeless the Right to Sue for ‘Harassment’

Opinion

DeSantis Caught Trying to Poach Trump Donors During Overseas Trip

Opinion