Connect with us


Pennsylvania’s COVID Lockdown Declared ‘Unconstitutional’ by Judge


Throughout the ongoing coronavirus pandemic, there have been arguments as to what the government can and cannot legally require of its citizens.  Some believe that our elected officials should issue guidelines but not mandates, suggestions and not ordinances.  This is an American-styled argument, of course, with out nation possessing a long history of anti-government sentiment.

Despite these arguments, a number of locales have moved forward with attempts to restrict the activities of the people, hoping to force their citizens to abide by their best intentions, not by coercing them to do so.

In Pennsylvania, these sorts of virus-battling mandates have now been declared unconstitutional.

Trending: Protest Violence Takes a Turn as BLM Supporter Arrested for Attempted Murder

A federal judge on Monday struck down Gov. Tom Wolf’s pandemic restrictions that required people to stay at home, placed size limits on gatherings and ordered “non-life-sustaining” businesses to shut down, calling them unconstitutional.

take our poll - story continues below

Will You Be Voting In Person November 3rd?

  • Will You Be Voting In Person November 3rd?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Liberty Hub updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

U.S. District Judge William Stickman IV sided with plaintiffs that included hair salons, drive-in movie theaters, a farmer’s market vendor, a horse trainer and several Republican officeholders who sued as individuals.

Stickman, an appointee of President Donald Trump, wrote in his ruling that the Wolf administration’s pandemic policies have been overreaching, arbitrary and violated citizens’ constitutional rights.

The governor’s efforts to slow the spread of the coronavirus “were undertaken with the good intention of addressing a public health emergency,” Stickman wrote. “But even in an emergency, the authority of government is not unfettered.”

The issue here is one of constitution, not conscience, and it is still quite advisable to practice social distancing and mask-wearing, especially as Americans hope to be able to gather safely for the coming holidays.

Save conservative media!

Become an insider!

Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

You Might Like

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it, please mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

You Might Like

DEFCON 5: New York Times Decides That The New ‘Civil War’ Has Begun


Biden’s Latest Flub: Candidate Says He Attended Historically-Black College


Dems Threaten to Boycott Meetings with Amy Coney Barrett, Which Accomplishes Nothing


MUST SEE: Neighborhood Terrified as Robot Dog Roams the Streets; Some Threaten to Shoot It