SCOTUS Shuts Out Any and All Cases Discussing Alleged 2020 Election Fraud
Justice Clarence Thomas penned a feisty dissent, however.
After months of nationwide debate on the subject of the 2020 election, the Supreme Court has said “enough”.
The high court has now roundly rejected the possibility of hearing any more cases regarding allegations of election “fraud” surrounding the contest.
“Our fellow citizens deserve better and expect more of us,” Justice Clarence Thomas declared Monday, when the Supreme Court decided — by one vote –to hear none of the 2020 election cases raising issues of voter fraud and illegal votes.
Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett voted with the liberal justices to deny review of the lower court decisions.
Thomas was adamant in his dissent, however.
“The Constitution gives to each state legislature authority to determine the ‘Manner’ of federal elections,” began Thomas. “Yet both before and after the 2020 election, nonlegislative officials in various States took it upon themselves to set the rules instead. As a result, we received an unusually high number of petitions and emergency applications contesting those changes. The petitions here present a clear example.”
“The Pennsylvania Legislature established an unambiguous deadline for receiving mail-in ballots: 8 p.m. on election day. Dissatisfied, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court extended that deadline by three days,” Thomas explained, referring to one of the rejected cases. “These cases provide us with an ideal opportunity to address just what authority nonlegislative officials have to set election rules, and to do so well before the next election cycle. The refusal to do so is inexplicable.”
“For more than a century, this Court has recognized that the Constitution operates as a limitation upon the State in respect of any attempt to circumscribe the legislative power to regulate federal elections,” he continued, quoting Supreme Court precedent. “Because the Federal Constitution, not state constitutions, gives state legislatures authority to regulate federal elections, petitioners presented a strong argument that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s decision violated the Constitution by overriding the clearly expressed intent of the legislature.”
His point was quite succinct:
“Unclear rules threaten to undermine this system. They sow confusion and ultimately dampen confidence in the integrity and fairness of elections,” he explained. “To prevent confusion, we have thus repeatedly — although not as consistently as we should — blocked rule changes made by courts close to an election.”
The move is sure to anger the MAGA movement, who fought vociferously for the courts to examine concerns over the processes used in 2020.
Become an insider!
Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.
Schaftlein Report | American Education and the Opioid Epidemic with Filmmaker Joaquin Fernandez
Trending Now on Liberty Hub
DeSantis Drops Legal TRUTH BOMB About Trump Indictment
Trump Loses Support of Former Governor as ’24 Turbulence Continues
Trump Drops Unmistakable Warning to DeSantis Staff
SHOCKING Number of Documents Found at Biden Penn Center Office
White House Dodges Question About CONFISCATING AMERICAN GUNS
VIDEO: Biden Slammed for LAUGHING About Christian School Attack
Notable Conservative Seeks Crowdfunding for Cancer Treatment
Join the conversation!
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it, please mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.