Connect with us

Politics

The Fight For Trump’s Tax Returns Reemerges Outside of Washington Swamp

It looks like Nadler and the democrats are getting a little help from their buddies up the coast.

President Donald Trump heartily bucked tradition when he refused to release his tax returns to the public during the 2016 election cycle, and democrats are still in a tizzy about it.

Trump, a proclaimed billionaire real estate investor, has cited ongoing audits as the reason for becoming the first President to deny the public a peek at his profits.  His lawyers have backed him up on this, encouraging the President to leave the documents in the dark for now on account of this IRS action.

But that hasn’t stopped foes of the President from launching countless diatribes against the move, despite there being exactly zero legal retirement for an elected official to do so.

Trending: Mainstream media catches up to online amateur investigators in Epstein ‘temple’ inquiry

Beyond the constant chatter, Congressional democrats have attempted to subpoena at least six years of Trump tax returns as well, in a fairly ridiculous manner.

take our poll - story continues below

Which Democrat Presidential Hopeful Has The Wildest Campaign Promise So Far?

  • Which Democrat Presidential Hopeful Has The Wildest Campaign Promise So Far?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Liberty Hub updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Now, the President’s old pals in New York are joining the fray as well, seeking to sneak a peek of the President’s portfolio through the Empire State’s judicial system.

[…]on Monday, state Sen. Brad Hoylman introduced S5072, which would amend the law and require the commissioner of taxation and finance “to cooperate with investigations by certain committees of the United States Congress under certain circumstances” – a bid to let the state share tax return information, specifically Trump’s, with congressional committees that request it.

“This new bill will permit New York State to comply with requests from congressional investigative committees and help ensure Congress can’t be blocked in their attempts to hold even the highest elected officials in the land accountable to the American people,” Hoylman said in a statement.

The maneuver seems to be just another layer to the federal inquiry.

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y., said in a statement that the bill could help Congress get tax returns if blocked at the federal level – an apparent reference to an effort by another House committee to get six years of Trump’s returns directly from the IRS.

“This legislation would make the work of a federal committee a little easier, if confronted with inability to receive the federal tax return, we can turn to New York State,” Nadler said.

The use of the NY State legal system to annoy and perturb the President isn’t a new one, however.

After former Trump aide Paul Manafort was federally sentenced for crimes uncovered by Robert Mueller, New York prosecutors also charged Manafort in their courts, which is someplace that presidential pardons have no jurisdiction.

Become an insider!

Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

You Might Like

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

Meghan McCain uses fifth grade psychology to double-dog-dare congress into action over Trump tweets

Entertainment

MADE IN AMERICA: Trump unleashes new ‘America First’ manufacturing requirements

Politics

Mainstream media catches up to online amateur investigators in Epstein ‘temple’ inquiry

News

Robert Mueller Robert Mueller

Mueller makes deal with Congress, setting date for controversial testimony

Politics