Connect with us


Trump eyeing major gun law changes after weekend of carnage

But will this sort of legislation create a slippery slope for future democratic presidents to exploit?

We are living in history, ladies and gentlemen of this great nation, and how we tread in the coming days will steer our future in ways that we maybe have never imagined before.

After a series of mass shooting took place around the nation last week, members of Congress have been under extreme pressure to do something, anything in order to prevent similar attacks from coming to fruition.  For many, the answers lie in so-called “red flag” laws that are meant to sniff out potential mass shooters before they strike.

The President seems on board.

Trending: Colorado’s ‘Red Flag’ Laws Allow for Confiscation of Guns, But One Sheriff Isn’t Having It

“I’m looking to do background checks,” Trump told reporters as he departed the White House on Wednesday to visit the two violence-stricken cities. “I think background checks are important.”

take our poll - story continues below

Did SCOTUS make the right decision on medical mandates for large businesses?

  • Did SCOTUS make the right decision on medical mandates for large businesses?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Liberty Hub updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

While he said there’s not enough support in Congress to re-enact what was commonly known as the assault weapons ban, which expired in 2004, he indicated he would discuss the idea with lawmakers. “I will certainly bring that up,” he said.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has refused so far to allow a vote on House-passed legislation that would expand background checks and hasn’t indicated whether he’s reconsidering after the shootings, which killed at least 31 people.

“I think we can bring up background checks like we’ve never had before,” Trump said.

Trump previously stated that he has no “political appetite” for an “assault weapons” ban, however.

The move for stricter background checks won’t be without adversity.  Many believe that any impedance to owning a firearm is an infringement on the Second Amendment, and a slippery slope that will allow the Government to enact further restrictions in the future…particularly in the case that a staunch, anti-2A liberal president were to build upon what is done now.



Become an insider!

Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

You Might Like

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it, please mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

You Might Like

Navy Makes Stunning Confession Regarding UFO Footage


Andrew Cuomo Scandals Having Major Impact on Brother’s Ratings


Nancy Pelosi Nancy Pelosi

Pelosi Pounces, Makes Mockery of ‘The Squad’ in New Book


World Rages as Japan Plans to Dump Fukushima Water into Ocean